This week was more of the same. I ran two sets of simulations from the network local to Clemson to the network similar to that of Utah. It was not much different. I had to make sure that all the data was good. I was happy because I was able to add to my programs User-interface to be able to have the system send a message when the system run collapsed. It works really good to. After the run is complete I don't have to worry about the quality of the run because the system does it for me. Im kinda kicking my self for not doing it earlier but It was a thought that wasn't pertinent. |
From the data that I collected I was able to make these chart. Each chart depicts the data values across 21 simulation. As you can see when using different networks there is little statistical difference as opposed to using local networks, but the number of g ood in dividuals increased using different networks. One of the papers I read written by Zach McNellis and Dr. Remy suggested that not enough noise and the performance was poor, but enough noise and the performance was good. Like the Goldilocks zone. Over the internet there is noise, so the program works with that. From joey to joey, if someone runs something then the program freaks out and performance drops. |